Does science influence the logic we ought to use: A reflection on the quantum logic controversy

DOI10.1007/s11225-010-9245-7zbMath1202.81009OpenAlexW2120262976MaRDI QIDQ609635

Michael Ashcroft

Publication date: 1 December 2010

Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-010-9245-7

zbMATH Keywords

Hilbert latticesquantum mechanicsquantum logicsemanticsBoolean latticesscience

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Logical foundations of quantum mechanics; quantum logic (quantum-theoretic aspects) (81P10)

Related Items

Why classical logic is privileged: justification of logics based on translatability ⋮ Modeling and in vitro and in vivo characterization of a tissue engineered pancreatic substitute ⋮ Meaning-preserving translations of non-classical logics into classical logic: between pluralism and monism

Uses Software

• PLINK

Cites Work

• Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics.
• Formalism and interpretation in quantum theory
• An introduction to Hilbert space and quantum logic
• Tensor products of orthoalgebras
• The lattice theoretic background of the dimension theory of operator algebras
• Spectral Methods for a Generalized Probability Theory
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Does science influence the logic we ought to use: A reflection on the quantum logic controversy