Who should be regulated: genuine producers or third parties?

DOI10.1007/S00712-022-00808-5MaRDI QIDQ6101003zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Keisuke Hattori, Keisaku Higashida

Publication date 20 June 2023

Published in Journal of Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-022-00808-5

zbMATH Keywords

advertisinganti-trust lawgenuine productstechnical barriers

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

PDEs in connection with game theory, economics, social and behavioral sciences (35Q91) Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26)

Recommendations

• Competing Gatekeepers
• Quality choice and advertising regulation in broadcasting markets
• Monopolistic competition model with retailing
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 32502
• Informative Advertising and Competition: A Noncooperative Approach

Cites work

• Brand premia driven by perceived vertical differentiation in markets with information disparity and optimistic consumers
• Counterfeiting, enforcement and social welfare
• Endogenous vertical segmentation in a Cournot oligopoly
• Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling.
• Fines imposed on counterfeiters and pocketed by the genuine firm. A differential game approach
• Two-dimensional vertical differentiation with attribute dependence
• Two-sided competition with vertical differentiation

Cited in

(1)

• Anger and regulation

This page was built for publication: Who should be regulated: genuine producers or third parties?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6101003)