A note on non-monogenity of number fields arised from sextic trinomials
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6110356
DOI10.2989/16073606.2022.2043948OpenAlexW4221010395MaRDI QIDQ6110356FDOQ6110356
Publication date: 5 July 2023
Published in: Quaestiones Mathematicae (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2989/16073606.2022.2043948
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On prolongations of valuations via Newton polygons and liftings of polynomials
- Factorization over local fields and the irreducibility of generalized difference polynomials
- Integral bases and monogenity of pure fields
- On certain pure sextic fields related to a problem of Hasse
- Power integral bases for certain pure sextic fields
- On nonmonogenic number fields defined by
Cited In (8)
- On monogenity of certain number fields defined by trinomials
- Nonmonogenity of number fields defined by trinomials
- On non-monogenity of the number fields defined by certain quadrinomials
- On non monogenity of certain number fields defined by trinomials \(x^6 + ax^3 + b\)
- On index divisors and non-monogenity of certain quintic number fields defined by x5 + axm + bx + c
- \(A_4\)-sextic fields with a power basis
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Non-monogenity of certain octic number fields defined by trinomials
Recommendations
- Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
- On monogenity of certain number fields defined by trinomials 👍 👎
- Monogenity in totally complex sextic fields, revisited 👍 👎
- ON THE MONOGENITY OF TOTALLY COMPLEX PURE SEXTIC FIELDS 👍 👎
- On integral bases and monogeneity of pure sextic number fields with non-squarefree coefficients 👍 👎
- Non-monogeneity in a family of sextic fields 👍 👎
- Nonmonogenity of number fields defined by trinomials 👍 👎
- On non monogenity of certain number fields defined by trinomials \(x^6 + ax^3 + b\) 👍 👎
- On nonmonogenic number fields defined by trinomials of type \(x^n +ax^m+b\) 👍 👎
- On nonmonogenic number fields defined by 👍 👎
This page was built for publication: A note on non-monogenity of number fields arised from sextic trinomials
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6110356)