Comparison of the Helmholtz, Gibbs, and collective-modes methods to obtain nonaffine elastic constants

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6115409

DOI10.1016/J.JMPS.2020.103954zbMATH Open1516.74010arXiv1908.08758OpenAlexW3015136564MaRDI QIDQ6115409FDOQ6115409


Authors: Bingyu Cui, Eugene Terentjev Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 10 August 2023

Published in: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We review and compare the Born-Huang and the Lemaitre-Maloney's theories that lead to analytical expressions for elastic constants, accounting for affine and nonaffine deformations in a lattice. The Born-Huang method is based on Helmholtz energy while the Lemaitre-Maloney's formalism focus on Gibbs force. Although starting from different perspectives, in the linear elastic limit, and in equilibrium, elastic material constants must be the same in all these methods. This is explicitly verified on examples of linear chains, and numerical simulation of a non-centrosymmetric crystal.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08758




Recommendations




Cites Work






This page was built for publication: Comparison of the Helmholtz, Gibbs, and collective-modes methods to obtain nonaffine elastic constants

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6115409)