Paraconsistent logic and query answering in inconsistent databases
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6117329
Abstract: This paper concerns the paraconsistent logic LPQ and an application of it in the area of relational database theory. The notions of a relational database, a query applicable to a relational database, and a consistent answer to a query with respect to a possibly inconsistent relational database are considered from the perspective of this logic. This perspective enables among other things the definition of a consistent answer to a query with respect to a possibly inconsistent database without resort to database repairs. In a previous paper, LPQ is presented with a sequent-style natural deduction proof system. In this paper, a sequent calculus proof system is presented because it is common to use a sequent calculus proof system as the basis of proof search procedures and such procedures may form the core of algorithms for computing consistent answers to queries.
Cites work
- A paraconsistent relational data model
- A relational model of data for large shared data banks
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3874667 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3993546 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the data complexity of consistent query answering
- On the strongest three-valued paraconsistent logic contained in classical logic and its dual
- Proof theory
- Querying logical databases
- Structural proof theory. With an appendix by Aarne Ranta
- Subminimal negation
- The lattice of extensions of the minimal logic
- The logic of paradox
- Truth in a logic of formal inconsistency: how classical can it get?
This page was built for publication: Paraconsistent logic and query answering in inconsistent databases
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6117329)