Heterogeneous heterogeneity by default: Testing categorical moderators in mixed‐effects meta‐analysis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6127094
DOI10.1111/BMSP.12299OpenAlexW4319059272MaRDI QIDQ6127094
Unnamed Author, Paul-Christian Bürkner, Donald R. Williams
Publication date: 10 April 2024
Published in: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12299
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- An Application of a Mixed-Effects Location Scale Model for Analysis of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Data
- Valid post-selection inference
- An Extended ANOVA F-Test with Applications to the Heterogeneity Problem in Meta-Analysis
- Introduction to Meta‐Analysis
- Analysis of categorical moderators in mixed‐effects meta‐analysis: Consequences of using pooled versus separate estimates of the residual between‐studies variances
- Estimation of the predictive power of the model in mixed‐effects meta‐regression: A simulation study
- Heterogeneity and study size in random-effects meta-analysis
- Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal
- Double Hierarchical Generalized Linear Models (With Discussion)
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO MEANS WHEN THE POPULATION VARIANCES ARE UNEQUAL
This page was built for publication: Heterogeneous heterogeneity by default: Testing categorical moderators in mixed‐effects meta‐analysis