On the failure of the Nehari theorem for Paley-Wiener spaces
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6130366
Abstract: Let be a nonempty, open and convex subset of . The Paley-Wiener space with respect to is defined to be the closed subspace of of functions with Fourier transform supported in . For a tempered distribution we define a Hankel operator to be the densely defined operator: widehat{H_{phi}f}(x)=int_{Omega}widehat{f}(y)widehat{phi}(x+y)dy, ext{ for }. We say that the Nehari theorem is true for , if every bounded Hankel operator is generated by a bounded function. In this paper we prove that the Nehari theorem fails for any convex set in that has infinitely many extreme points. In particular, it fails for all convex bounded sets which are not polytopes. In addition, it fails for all convex sets in that are not polyhedra.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3812329 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4101930 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1875877 (Why is no real title available?)
- Convex Analysis
- Hankel operators on the Paley-Wiener space in \({\mathbb{R}}^ d\)
- Lectures on Polytopes
- Lectures on convex geometry
- Minkowski's theorem for arbitrary convex sets
- Nehari’s Theorem for Convex Domain Hankel and Toeplitz Operators in Several Variables
- Notification of error: Multiparameter Riesz commutators
- On Completely Continuous Hankel Matrices
- On bounded bilinear forms
- On general domain truncated correlation and convolution operators with finite rank
- On the structure of positive semi-definite finite rank general domain Hankel and Toeplitz operators in several variables
- The Nehari problem for the Paley-Wiener space of a disc
- Toeplitz and Hankel operators on the Paley-Wiener space
This page was built for publication: On the failure of the Nehari theorem for Paley-Wiener spaces
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6130366)