Two ways to scare a Gruffalo

DOI10.1007/978-3-031-26689-8_4OpenAlexW4321441057MaRDI QIDQ6132566FDOQ6132566

Authors: Shikha Singh, Kamal Lodaya, Deepak Khemani 

Publication date: 17 August 2023

Published in: Logic and Its Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26689-8_4

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1537935
• scientific article
• Endogenizing epistemic actions
• Logics for epistemic programs
• Dynamics of lying

zbMATH Keywords

deceptionforgeryepistemic planningagent-updatecompleteness and decidability

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) General logic (03Bxx)

Cites Work

• The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions
• Logics of communication and change
• Logics for epistemic programs
• Dynamic logic for belief revision
• A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Weak, strong, and strong cyclic planning via symbolic model checking
• Dynamic epistemic logic
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• One hundred prisoners and a light bulb
• An action language for multi-agent domains
• DEL planning and some tractable cases
• Truth in fiction. Rethinking its logic. The Istanbul lectures
• More for free: a dynamic epistemic framework for conformant planning over transition systems
• Modelling deception using theory of mind in multi-agent systems
• Quantifier-free epistemic term-modal logic with assignment operator

Cited In (1)

• Title not available (Why is that?)

This page was built for publication: Two ways to scare a Gruffalo

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6132566)