Are special biserial algebras homologically tame?

DOI10.1007/S10468-022-10120-XMaRDI QIDQ6133685zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Claus Michael Ringel

Publication date 21 August 2023

Published in Algebras and Representation Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04924

zbMATH Keywords

finitistic dimensionspecial biserial algebras

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Homological dimension in associative algebras (16E10) Representations of quivers and partially ordered sets (16G20) Representation type (finite, tame, wild, etc.) of associative algebras (16G60)

Abstract: Birge Huisgen-Zimmermann calls a finite dimensional algebra homologically tame provided the little and the big finitistic dimension are equal and finite. The question formulated in the title has been discussed by her in the paper "Representation-tame algebras need not be homologically tame", by looking for any $r>0$ at a sequence of algebras $Lambd{a}_m$ with big finitistic dimension $r+m$. As we will show, also the little finitistic dimension of $Lambd{a}_m$ is r+m. It follows that contrary to her assertion, all her algebras $Lambd{a}_m$ are homologically tame.

Recommendations

• Representation-tame algebras need not be homologically tame
• Tame biserial algebras
• Tameness of biserial algebras
• On Hom-spaces of tame algebras.
• On derived tame algebras.

Cites work

• Representation-tame algebras need not be homologically tame

This page was built for publication: Are special biserial algebras homologically tame?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6133685)