Are special biserial algebras homologically tame?

DOI10.1007/S10468-022-10120-XarXiv2106.04924OpenAlexW3169379620MaRDI QIDQ6133685FDOQ6133685

Authors: Claus Michael Ringel 

Publication date: 21 August 2023

Published in: Algebras and Representation Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Birge Huisgen-Zimmermann calls a finite dimensional algebra homologically tame provided the little and the big finitistic dimension are equal and finite. The question formulated in the title has been discussed by her in the paper "Representation-tame algebras need not be homologically tame", by looking for any $r>0$ at a sequence of algebras $Lambd{a}_m$ with big finitistic dimension $r+m$. As we will show, also the little finitistic dimension of $Lambd{a}_m$ is r+m. It follows that contrary to her assertion, all her algebras $Lambd{a}_m$ are homologically tame.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04924

zbMATH Keywords

finitistic dimensionspecial biserial algebras

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Homological dimension in associative algebras (16E10) Representations of quivers and partially ordered sets (16G20) Representation type (finite, tame, wild, etc.) of associative algebras (16G60)

Cites Work

• Representation-tame algebras need not be homologically tame

This page was built for publication: Are special biserial algebras homologically tame?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6133685)