When is the search of relatively maximal subgroups reduced to quotient groups?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6137450

DOI10.4213/IM9277EzbMATH Open1529.20055arXiv2110.15638OpenAlexW4381306350MaRDI QIDQ6137450FDOQ6137450

Wenbin Guo, D. O. Revin

Publication date: 2 September 2023

Published in: Izvestiya: Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Let mathfrakX be a class of finite groups closed under taking subgroups, homomorphic images, and extensions. Denote by mathrmkmathfrakX(G) the number of conjugacy classes mathfrakX-maximal subgroups of a finite group G. The natural problem to describe up to conjugacy mathfrakX-maximal subgroups of a given finite group is complicated by the fact that it is not inductive. In particular, generally speaking, the image of an mathfrakX-maximal subgroup is not mathfrakX-maximal in the image of a homomorphism. Nevertheless, there are group homomorphisms which preserve the number of conjugacy classes of mathfrakX-maximal subgroups (for example, the homomorphisms whose kernels are mathfrakX-groups). Under such homomorphisms, the image of an mathfrakX-maximal subgroup is always mathfrakX-maximal and, moreover, there is a natural bijection between the conjugacy classes of mathfrakX-maximal subgroups of the image and preimage. All such homomorphisms are completely described in the paper. More precisely, it is proved that, for a homomorphism phi from a group G, the equality mathrmkmathfrakX(G)=mathrmkmathfrakX(mathrmim,phi) holds if and only if mathrmkmathfrakX(kerphi)=1, which in turn is equivalent to the fact that the composition factors of the kernel of phi belong to an explicitly given list.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.15638






Cited In (2)






This page was built for publication: When is the search of relatively maximal subgroups reduced to quotient groups?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6137450)