The correctness and relevance of the modal ontological argument

DOI10.1007/S11229-020-02908-5zbMATH Open1529.03016OpenAlexW3115305840MaRDI QIDQ6142467FDOQ6142467

Authors: Andrzej Bilat 

Publication date: 26 January 2024

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02908-5

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3557726
• Formal approaches to the ontological argument
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 922621
• A brief critical introduction to the ontological argument and its formalization: Anselm, Gaunilo, Descartes, Leibniz and Kant
• Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm's ontological argument

zbMATH Keywords

modal logicformal correctness of argumentmini-theories of Godrelevance of argumentsimplicity of argumentstructure of argument

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm's ontological argument
• Modal logics with the MacIntosh rule
• An even more Leibnizian version of Gödel's ontological argument

This page was built for publication: The correctness and relevance of the modal ontological argument

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6142467)