The correctness and relevance of the modal ontological argument

DOI10.1007/S11229-020-02908-5MaRDI QIDQ6142467zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Andrzej Bilat

Publication date 26 January 2024

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02908-5

zbMATH Keywords

modal logicformal correctness of argumentmini-theories of Godrelevance of argumentsimplicity of argumentstructure of argument

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3557726
• Formal approaches to the ontological argument
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 922621
• A brief critical introduction to the ontological argument and its formalization: Anselm, Gaunilo, Descartes, Leibniz and Kant
• Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm's ontological argument

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3670430 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3066797 (Why is no real title available?)
• An even more Leibnizian version of Gödel's ontological argument
• Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm's ontological argument
• Modal logics with the MacIntosh rule

This page was built for publication: The correctness and relevance of the modal ontological argument

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6142467)