Incompatibility, inconsistency, and logical analysis in \textit{Tractatus logico-philosophicus}

DOI10.1007/S11229-021-03157-WMaRDI QIDQ6147169zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Ivan Welty

Publication date 1 February 2024

Published in Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03157-w

zbMATH Keywords

color incompatibility problemelementary propositionslogical analysislogical spacerational reconstructionsimplessolipsismTractatusWittgenstein

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2212218
• Passed over in silence. On Wittgenstein's `Tractatus' and its system
• A Note on Saying Nothing and Saying More in theTractatus
• The Expressive Power of theN-Operator and the Decidability of Logic in Wittgenstein’sTractatus
• Tractatus in context. The essential background for appreciating Wittgenstein's \textit{Tractatus logico-philosophicus}

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3697070 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3055933 (Why is no real title available?)
• Solving the color incompatibility problem
• The coarse-graining approach to statistical mechanics: how blissful is our ignorance?
• Tractarian first-order logic: identity and the N-operator
• Tractarian semantics for predicate logic
• Wittgenstein's \(ab\)-notation: an iconic proof procedure

This page was built for publication: Incompatibility, inconsistency, and logical analysis in \textit{Tractatus logico-philosophicus}

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6147169)