Degrees of riskiness, falsifiability, and truthlikeness. A neo-Popperian account applicable to probabilistic theories
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6147499
Abstract: In this paper, we take a fresh look at three Popperian concepts: riskiness, falsifiability, and truthlikeness (or verisimilitude) of scientific hypotheses or theories. First, we make explicit the dimensions that underlie the notion of riskiness. Secondly, we examine if and how degrees of falsifiability can be defined, and how they are related to various dimensions of the concept of riskiness as well as the experimental context. Thirdly, we consider the relation of riskiness to (expected degrees of) truthlikeness. Throughout, we pay special attention to probabilistic theories and we offer a tentative, quantitative account of verisimilitude for probabilistic theories.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Bayesian account of the virtue of unification
- A Bayesian Defence of Popperian Science?
- A partial consequence account of truthlikeness
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3136643 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1233702 (Why is no real title available?)
- New theory about old evidence. A framework for open-minded Bayesianism
- ON POPPER'S DEFINITIONS OF VERISIMILITUDE1
- POPPER'S QUALITATIVE THEORY OF VERISIMILITUDE
- The development of the Hintikka program
- Two impossibility results for measures of corroboration
- Using conceptual spaces to exhibit conceptual continuity through scientific theory change
- Verisimilitude and content
- Zwart and Franssen's impossibility theorem holds for possible-world-accounts but not for consequence-accounts to verisimilitude
This page was built for publication: Degrees of riskiness, falsifiability, and truthlikeness. A neo-Popperian account applicable to probabilistic theories
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6147499)