Ranking econometric techniques using geometrical benefit of doubt
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6148802
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5243765 (Why is no real title available?)
- A comparison of biased simulation schemes for stochastic volatility models
- A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis
- Approaches to forecasting volatility: Models and their performances for emerging equity markets
- Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation
- Composite indicators as generalized benefit-of-the-doubt weighted averages
- Decision-based methods for forecast evaluation
- Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions
- Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity
- Geometric composite indicators with compromise benefit-of-the-doubt weights
- Geometric mean quantity index numbers with benefit-of-the-doubt weights
- Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis
- Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
- Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models: Bayesian Estimation and Model Comparison
- Prioritizing of volatility models: a computational analysis using data envelopment analysis
- Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis
- Threshold heteroskedastic models
- What good is a volatility model?
This page was built for publication: Ranking econometric techniques using geometrical benefit of doubt
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6148802)
