Can you take Akemann-Weaver's __1 away?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6156066



Abstract: By Glimm's dichotomy, a separable, simple extrmC∗-algebra has continuum-many unitarily inequivalent irreducible representations if, and only if, it is non-type I while all of its irreducible representations are unitarily equivalent if, and only if, it is type I. Naimark asked whether the latter equivalence holds for all extrmC∗-algebras. In 2004, Akemann and Weaver gave a negative answer to Naimark's problem, using Jensen's diamond axiom diamondsuitaleph1, a powerful diagonalization principle that implies the Continuum Hypothesis (mathsfCH). By a result of Rosenberg, a separably represented simple extrmC∗-algebra with a unique irreducible representation is necessarily of type I. We show that this result is sharp by constructing an example of a separably represented, simple extrmC∗-algebra that has exactly two inequivalent irreducible representations, and therefore does not satisfy the conclusion of Glimm's dichotomy. Our construction uses a weakening of Jensen's diamondsuitaleph1, denoted diamondsuitmathsfCohen, that holds in the original Cohen's model for the negation of mathsfCH. We also prove that diamondsuitmathsfCohen suffices to give a negative answer to Naimark's problem. Our main technical tool is a forcing notion that generically adds an automorphism of a given extrmC∗-algebra with a prescribed action on its space of pure states.













This page was built for publication: Can you take Akemann-Weaver's \(\diamondsuit_{\aleph_1}\) away?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6156066)