Assessing the accuracy of exponentially weighted moving average models for Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of crypto portfolios
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6158409
DOI10.1080/14697688.2022.2159505zbMath1518.91313OpenAlexW4319832790MaRDI QIDQ6158409
Carol Alexander, Unnamed Author
Publication date: 20 June 2023
Published in: Quantitative Finance (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2022.2159505
volatility clusteringcontinuous ranked probability scoreenergy scoreconditional VaRtraffic light tests
Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH) (62M10) Statistical methods; risk measures (91G70)
Cites Work
- The Model Confidence Set
- Higher order elicitability and Osband's principle
- Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies
- Volatility forecasting accuracy for Bitcoin
- Optimization of computer simulation models with rare events
- Bitcoin futures -- what use are they?
- Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: a comparison of GARCH models
- Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity
- Forecasting volatility in bitcoin market
- Comparing Density Forecasts Using Threshold- and Quantile-Weighted Scoring Rules
- Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach
- A Component GARCH Model with Time Varying Weights
- A Class of Nonlinear Arch Models
- Scoring Rules for Continuous Probability Distributions
- Robust bootstrap forecast densities for GARCH returns and volatilities
- Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
- Threshold heteroskedastic models
- Evaluating the RiskMetrics methodology in measuring volatility and Value-at-Risk in financial markets
This page was built for publication: Assessing the accuracy of exponentially weighted moving average models for Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall of crypto portfolios