(1+1) genetic programming with functionally complete instruction sets can evolve Boolean conjunctions and disjunctions with arbitrarily small error
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6161501
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2023.103906arXiv2303.07455MaRDI QIDQ6161501
Andrei Lissovoi, Pietro S. Oliveto, Benjamin Doerr
Publication date: 27 June 2023
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07455
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Crossover can provably be useful in evolutionary computation
- Randomized local search, evolutionary algorithms, and the minimum spanning tree problem
- On the analysis of the \((1+1)\) evolutionary algorithm
- Adaptive drift analysis
- Multiplicative drift analysis
- On the benefits of populations for the exploitation speed of standard steady-state genetic algorithms
- The Max problem revisited: the importance of mutation in genetic programming
- The impact of lexicographic parsimony pressure for ORDER/MAJORITY on the run time
- Analyzing randomized search heuristics via stochastic domination
- Fixed-parameter tractability of crossover: steady-state GAs on the closest string problem
- Theoretical analysis of local search strategies to optimize network communication subject to preserving the total number of links
- On the Time and Space Complexity of Genetic Programming for Evolving Boolean Conjunctions
- Theory of Evolutionary Computation
- Computational complexity analysis of simple genetic programming on two problems modeling isolated program semantics
This page was built for publication: (1+1) genetic programming with functionally complete instruction sets can evolve Boolean conjunctions and disjunctions with arbitrarily small error