Reflection principles, GCH and the uniformization properties
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6161729
DOI10.1007/S11856-022-2386-3arXiv2001.12005OpenAlexW4309637687MaRDI QIDQ6161729
Publication date: 5 June 2023
Published in: Israel Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.12005
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Aronszajn and Kurepa trees
- Diamond (on the regulars) can fail at any strongly unfoldable cardinal
- Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I
- The uniformization property for \(chi_ 2\).
- The indescribability of the order of the indescribable cardinals
- Forcing axioms and stationary sets
- Making the supercompactness of \(\nu\) indestructible under \(\nu\)-directed closed forcing
- Large cardinals and definable counterexamples to the continuum hypothesis
- Fake reflection
- Higher Souslin trees and the GCH, revisited
- Jensen's diamond principle and its relatives
- Forcing indestructibility of set-theoretic axioms
- Diamond, GCH and weak square
- Diamonds
- Stacking mice
- Some Combinatorial Properties of Trees
- Higher Souslin trees and the generalized continuum hypothesis
- Reflecting stationary sets
- A relative of the approachability ideal, diamond and non-saturation
- (Weak) diamond can fail at the least inaccessible cardinal
- Souslin trees at successors of regular cardinals
- Diamonds, compactness, and measure sequences
- Weak prediction principles
- The failure of diamond on a reflecting stationary set
- Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property
- The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy
This page was built for publication: Reflection principles, GCH and the uniformization properties
