Is a Classification Procedure Good Enough?—A Goodness-of-Fit Assessment Tool for Classification Learning
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6165300
DOI10.1080/01621459.2021.1979010arXiv1911.03063OpenAlexW3198616475MaRDI QIDQ6165300
Jia-Wei Zhang, Jie Ding, Yuhong Yang
Publication date: 4 July 2023
Published in: Journal of the American Statistical Association (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03063
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances
- An omnibus lack of fit test in logistic regression with sparse data
- Increasing the power: a practical approach to goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression models with continuous predictors
- Pearson-type goodness-of-fit test with bootstrap maximum likelihood estimation
- Joint Variable Selection for Fixed and Random Effects in Linear Mixed-Effects Models
- On the Asymptotic Distribution of Pearson's Statistic in Linear Exponential-Family Models
- Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model
- Normal Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Multinomial Models with Large Degrees of Freedom
- An Improved Goodness of Fit Statistic for Probability Prediction Models
- Minimax nonparametric classification .I. Rates of convergence
- A Goodness-of-Fit Test for Binary Regression Models, Based on Smoothing Methods
- Goodness-of-fit Testing in High Dimensional Generalized Linear Models
- Cross-Validation With Confidence
- On assessing binary regression models based on ungrouped data
- A comparison of the Hosmer–Lemeshow, Pigeon–Heyse, and Tsiatis goodness-of-fit tests for binary logistic regression under two grouping methods
- Testing goodness-of-fit in logistic case-control studies
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
This page was built for publication: Is a Classification Procedure Good Enough?—A Goodness-of-Fit Assessment Tool for Classification Learning
