Bernoulli Ballot Polling: A Manifest Improvement for Risk-Limiting Audits
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6166537
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-43725-1_16zbMATH Open1520.91145arXiv1812.06361OpenAlexW3013106234MaRDI QIDQ6166537FDOQ6166537
Authors: Bernhard, Ronald L. Rivest, Philip B. Stark
Publication date: 3 August 2023
Published in: Financial Cryptography and Data Security (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We present a method and software for ballot-polling risk-limiting audits (RLAs) based on Bernoulli sampling: ballots are included in the sample with probability , independently. Bernoulli sampling has several advantages: (1) it does not require a ballot manifest; (2) it can be conducted independently at different locations, rather than requiring a central authority to select the sample from the whole population of cast ballots or requiring stratified sampling; (3) it can start in polling places on election night, before margins are known. If the reported margins for the 2016 U.S. Presidential election are correct, a Bernoulli ballot-polling audit with a risk limit of 5% and a sampling rate of would have had at least a 99% probability of confirming the outcome in 42 states. (The other states were more likely to have needed to examine additional ballots.) Logistical and security advantages that auditing in the polling place affords may outweigh the cost of examining more ballots than some other methods might require.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06361
Recommendations
Voting theory (91B12) Computational methods for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance (91-08)
Cites Work
Cited In (5)
This page was built for publication: Bernoulli Ballot Polling: A Manifest Improvement for Risk-Limiting Audits
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6166537)