Comparing the expressiveness of the -calculus and CCS

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6166803

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-99336-8_20zbMATH Open1528.68258arXiv2203.11519OpenAlexW4225805607MaRDI QIDQ6166803FDOQ6166803


Authors: Rob van Glabbeek Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 3 August 2023

Published in: Programming Languages and Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: This paper shows that the pi-calculus with implicit matching is no more expressive than CCSgamma, a variant of CCS in which the result of a synchronisation of two actions is itself an action subject to relabelling or restriction, rather than the silent action au. This is done by exhibiting a compositional translation from the pi-calculus with implicit matching to CCSgamma that is valid up to strong barbed bisimilarity. The full pi-calculus can be similarly expressed in CCSgamma enriched with the triggering operation of Meije. I also show that these results cannot be recreated with CCS in the role of CCSgamma, not even up to reduction equivalence, and not even for the asynchronous pi-calculus without restriction or replication. Finally I observe that CCS cannot be encoded in the pi-calculus.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11519




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Comparing the expressiveness of the \(\pi \)-calculus and CCS

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6166803)