Revisiting the replica trick: competition between spin glass and conventional order

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6168029

DOI10.1007/S10955-023-03135-1arXiv2302.01361OpenAlexW4384560769MaRDI QIDQ6168029FDOQ6168029


Authors: Christopher L. Baldwin, Brian Swingle Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 8 August 2023

Published in: Journal of Statistical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: There is an ambiguity in how to apply the replica trick to spin glass models which have additional order parameters unrelated to spin glass order -- with respect to which quantities does one minimize vs maximize the action, and in what sequence? Here we show that the correct procedure is to first maximize with respect to ``replica order parameters, and then minimize with respect to ``conventional order parameters. With this result, we further elucidate the relationship between quenched free energies, annealed free energies, and replica order. Phase transitions in which the quenched and annealed free energies become unequal, which we term ``self-averaging transitions, do not necessarily correspond to the appearance of replica order. In fact, the quenched and annealed ensembles can each undergo transitions entirely independently of the other.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01361







Cites Work


Cited In (2)





This page was built for publication: Revisiting the replica trick: competition between spin glass and conventional order

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6168029)