The Lorentz transformation in a fishbowl: a comment on Cheng and Read's ``Why not a sound postulate?
DOI10.1007/s10701-023-00698-7zbMath1528.83160OpenAlexW4376279569MaRDI QIDQ6170732
Publication date: 13 July 2023
Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-023-00698-7
de Broglie waveOccam's razoranalogue gravityprinciple of relativityLorentzian relativityEinstein's ``constructive theory
Relativistic cosmology (83F05) Hydro- and aero-acoustics (76Q05) Special relativity (83A05) Analogues of general relativity in lower dimensions (83C80) History of relativity and gravitational theory (83-03) Local differential geometry of Lorentz metrics, indefinite metrics (53B30)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A case for Lorentzian relativity
- Sound clocks and sonic relativity
- Why not a sound postulate?
- Physical relativity from a functionalist perspective
- A real Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction
- Struktur der Materie
- Confirmation via Analogue Simulation: What Dumb Holes Could Tell Us about Gravity
- The present and the future of mathematical physics
- Analogue gravity
- The limitations of inertial frame spacetime functionalism
This page was built for publication: The Lorentz transformation in a fishbowl: a comment on Cheng and Read's ``Why not a sound postulate?