A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods

DOI10.1007/S10479-023-05339-WMaRDI QIDQ6170944zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Francesco Ciardiello, Andrea Genovese

Publication date 13 July 2023

Published in Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05339-w

zbMATH Keywords

additivitytrade-offcomputationmetricsTOPSISSAW

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Recommendations

• Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
• Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
• A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index
• Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.
• An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3049708 (Why is no real title available?)
• A Reconciliation among Discrete Compromise Solutions
• A WEIGHTED RANK MEASURE OF CORRELATION
• A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management
• A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection
• A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index
• A modified weighted TOPSIS to identify influential nodes in complex networks
• A multiple criteria decision making method based on relative value distances
• A new approach for multiple objective decision making
• Comparative Analysis of a Novel M-TOPSIS Method and TOPSIS
• Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights
• Comparison of multi-criteria decision methods through a ranking stability index
• Comparison of three modern multicriteria decision-making tools
• Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
• Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.
• Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights
• Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions
• Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods
• Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
• Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Transl. from the French by Mark R. McCord
• Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. A state-of- the-art survey
• Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys. In 2 volumes
• On blest's measure of rank correlation
• On rank reversal and TOPSIS method
• RELATIVE RATIO METHOD FOR MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS
• Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis
• Scoring procedures for multiple criteria decision aiding with robust and stochastic ordinal regression
• Significance Testing of the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
• TOPSIS for MODM
• The role of weights and scales in the application of multiobjective decision making

Cited in

(4)

• Comparison of macroeconomic performance of MENA countries with TOPSIS method
• Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
• Analysis of the best laptop selection system using simple additive weighting (SAW) method and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method
• Decision-makers' behavioral characteristics and multiple criteria decision aiding. Impact of decision-making style and experience on methods' use, evaluation, and recommendation

This page was built for publication: A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6170944)