A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6170944
DOI10.1007/S10479-023-05339-WzbMATH Open1519.90082OpenAlexW4376138766MaRDI QIDQ6170944FDOQ6170944
Authors: Francesco Ciardiello, Andrea Genovese 
Publication date: 13 July 2023
Published in: Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05339-w
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On blest's measure of rank correlation
- Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions
- Multiple criteria decision analysis. State of the art surveys. In 2 volumes
- Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis
- Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. A state-of- the-art survey
- Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.
- Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights
- Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Transl. from the French by Mark R. McCord
- Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights
- The role of weights and scales in the application of multiobjective decision making
- A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection
- Scoring procedures for multiple criteria decision aiding with robust and stochastic ordinal regression
- Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
- TOPSIS for MODM
- A WEIGHTED RANK MEASURE OF CORRELATION
- A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management
- RELATIVE RATIO METHOD FOR MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING PROBLEMS
- Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods
- A new approach for multiple objective decision making
- A Reconciliation among Discrete Compromise Solutions
- On rank reversal and TOPSIS method
- A multiple criteria decision making method based on relative value distances
- A modified weighted TOPSIS to identify influential nodes in complex networks
- A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index
- Significance Testing of the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient
- Comparison of three modern multicriteria decision-making tools
- Comparison of multi-criteria decision methods through a ranking stability index
- Comparative Analysis of a Novel M-TOPSIS Method and TOPSIS
Cited In (4)
- Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models
- Analysis of the best laptop selection system using simple additive weighting (SAW) method and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method
- Decision-makers' behavioral characteristics and multiple criteria decision aiding. Impact of decision-making style and experience on methods' use, evaluation, and recommendation
- Comparison of macroeconomic performance of MENA countries with TOPSIS method
This page was built for publication: A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6170944)
