Can we communicate? Using dynamic logic to verify team automata
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6174530
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4110131 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3688686 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1979561 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1556014 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1903369 (Why is no real title available?)
- A generic framework for \(n\)-protocol compatibility checking
- A theory of contracts for web services
- Automata for Specifying and Orchestrating Service Contracts
- Behavioural contracts for a sound assembly of components
- Compatibility in a multi-component environment
- Compatibility properties of synchronously and asynchronously communicating components
- Compliance in behavioural contracts: a brief survey
- Compositionality of safe communication in systems of team automata
- Featured Team Automata
- Modal I/O Automata for Interface and Product Line Theories
- Modeling and analysis of communicating systems
- Modularity for teams of I/O automata
- Moving from interface theories to assembly theories
- On Communicating Finite-State Machines
- On weak modal compatibility, refinement, and the MIO workbench
- Richer interface automata with optimistic and pessimistic compatibility
- Vector team automata
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Can we communicate? Using dynamic logic to verify team automata
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6174530)