Diagnostic test for misspecification of a random-effect distribution using the gradient function
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6176222
DOI10.1007/s42081-023-00189-zOpenAlexW4322626306MaRDI QIDQ6176222
Publication date: 25 July 2023
Published in: Japanese Journal of Statistics and Data Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42081-023-00189-z
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Misspecifying the shape of a random effects distribution: why getting it wrong may not matter
- Examples in which misspecification of a random effects distribution reduces efficiency, and possible remedies
- The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data
- Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models
- Models for discrete longitudinal data.
- Misspecified maximum likelihood estimates and generalised linear mixed models
- Testing for misspecification in generalized linear mixed models
- Goodness-of-Fit Methods for Generalized Linear Mixed Models
- A Semi‐Parametric Shared Parameter Model to Handle Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness
- Goodness-of-fit Tests for Mixed Models
- Goodness-of-fit tests of generalized linear mixed models for repeated ordinal responses
- Linear mixed models for longitudinal data
This page was built for publication: Diagnostic test for misspecification of a random-effect distribution using the gradient function