Large sets avoiding Infinite arithmetic / geometric progressions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6183680

DOI10.14321/REALANALEXCH.48.2.1668676378arXiv2210.09284OpenAlexW4387395414MaRDI QIDQ6183680FDOQ6183680


Authors: Alex Burgin, Samuel I. Goldberg, Tamás Keleti, Connor MacMahon, Xian-Zhi Wang Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 4 January 2024

Published in: Real Analysis Exchange (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We study some variants of the ErdH{o}s similarity problem. We pose the question if every measurable subset of the real line with positive measure contains a similar copy of an infinite geometric progression. We construct a compact subset E of the real line such that 0 is a Lebesgue density point of E, but E does not contain any (non-constant) infinite geometric progression. We give a sufficient density type condition that guarantees that a set contains an infinite geometric progression. By slightly improving a recent result of Bradford, Kohut and Mooroogen arXiv:2205.04786, we construct a closed set Fsubset[0,infty) such that the measure of Fcap[t,t+1] tends to 1 at infinity but F does not contain any infinite arithmetic progression. We also slightly improve a more general recent result by Kolountzakis and Papageorgiou arXiv:2208.02637 for more general sequences. We give a sufficient condition that guarantees that a given Cantor type set contains at least one infinite geometric progression with any quotient between 0 and 1. This can be applied to most symmetric Cantor sets of positive measure.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09284




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: Large sets avoiding Infinite arithmetic / geometric progressions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6183680)