Premature conclusions about the signal‐to‐noise ratio in structural equation modeling research: A commentary on Yuan and Fang (2023)

DOI10.1111/BMSP.12304MaRDI QIDQ6185863zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Jörg Henseler

Publication date 30 January 2024

Published in British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12304

zbMATH Keywords

effect sizecomposite modelfactor score regressioncovariance-based structural equation modelingHenseler-Ogasawara specificationpartial least squares structural equation modelingregression analysis with weighted compositessum scores

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis (62H25) Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Recommendations

• Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?
• Signal-to-noise ratio in estimating and testing the mediation effect: structural equation modeling versus path analysis with weighted composites
• A comparative evaluation of factor‐ and component‐based structural equation modelling approaches under (in)correct construct representations
• Data generation for composite-based structural equation modeling methods
• Exploratory structural equation modeling: a new trend of factor analysis

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3673370 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 45532 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48701 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1898277 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 845714 (Why is no real title available?)
• Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations
• Estimation of the signal-to-noise in the linear regression model
• Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems
• Statistical Analysis of Financial Data in S-Plus
• Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?

Cited in

(2)

• Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?
• Signal-to-noise ratio in estimating and testing the mediation effect: structural equation modeling versus path analysis with weighted composites

This page was built for publication: Premature conclusions about the signal‐to‐noise ratio in structural equation modeling research: A commentary on Yuan and Fang (2023)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6185863)