Premature conclusions about the signal‐to‐noise ratio in structural equation modeling research: A commentary on Yuan and Fang (2023)

DOI10.1111/BMSP.12304zbMATH Open1529.62086OpenAlexW4366236124MaRDI QIDQ6185863FDOQ6185863

Authors: Jörg Henseler 

Publication date: 30 January 2024

Published in: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12304

Recommendations

• Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?
• Signal-to-noise ratio in estimating and testing the mediation effect: structural equation modeling versus path analysis with weighted composites
• A comparative evaluation of factor‐ and component‐based structural equation modelling approaches under (in)correct construct representations
• Data generation for composite-based structural equation modeling methods
• Exploratory structural equation modeling: a new trend of factor analysis

zbMATH Keywords

effect sizecomposite modelfactor score regressioncovariance-based structural equation modelingHenseler-Ogasawara specificationpartial least squares structural equation modelingregression analysis with weighted compositessum scores

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis (62H25) Linear regression; mixed models (62J05) Applications of statistics to psychology (62P15)

Cites Work

• Statistical Analysis of Financial Data in S-Plus
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations
• Estimation of the signal-to-noise in the linear regression model
• Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?

Cited In (2)

• Which method delivers greater signal‐to‐noise ratio: Structural equation modelling or regression analysis with weighted composites?
• Signal-to-noise ratio in estimating and testing the mediation effect: structural equation modeling versus path analysis with weighted composites

This page was built for publication: Premature conclusions about the signal‐to‐noise ratio in structural equation modeling research: A commentary on Yuan and Fang (2023)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6185863)