Imposing unsupervised constraints to the benefit-of-the-doubt (BoD) model
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6195479
DOI10.1007/s40300-023-00254-3OpenAlexW4387501170MaRDI QIDQ6195479
Veljko Jeremic, Milica Maricic
Publication date: 14 March 2024
Published in: Metron (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-023-00254-3
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
- Selection of the number of clusters via the bootstrap method
- A new proposed model of restricted data envelopment analysis by correlation coefficients
- The bootstrap of the mean with arbitrary bootstrap sample size
- Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife
- On aggregating benefit of the doubt composite indicators
- Geometric composite indicators with compromise benefit-of-the-doubt weights
- Geometric mean quantity index numbers with benefit-of-the-doubt weights
- Composite indicators as generalized benefit-of-the-doubt weighted averages
- Measuring and analyzing country change in establishing ease of doing business using a revised version of World Bank's ease of doing business index
- Comprehensive world university ranking based on ranking aggregation
- Enhancing non-compensatory composite indicators: a directional proposal
- Subsampling versus bootstrapping in resampling-based model selection for multivariable regression
- Expert Panel Opinion and Global Sensitivity Analysis for Composite Indicators
- Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview
- A Scalable Bootstrap for Massive Data
- Canonical correlation analysis in the definition of weight restrictions for data envelopment analysis
This page was built for publication: Imposing unsupervised constraints to the benefit-of-the-doubt (BoD) model
