Exactness of Parrilo’s Conic Approximations for Copositive Matrices and Associated Low Order Bounds for the Stability Number of a Graph

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6199282

DOI10.1287/MOOR.2022.1290arXiv2109.12876WikidataQ114058146 ScholiaQ114058146MaRDI QIDQ6199282FDOQ6199282


Authors: Monique Laurent, Luis Felipe Vargas Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 23 February 2024

Published in: Mathematics of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: De Klerk and Pasechnik (2002) introduced the bounds vartheta(r)(G) (rinmathbbN) for the stability number alpha(G) of a graph G and conjectured exactness at order alpha(G)1: vartheta(alpha(G)1)(G)=alpha(G). These bounds rely on the conic approximations mathcalKn(r) by Parrilo (2000) for the copositive cone extCOPn. A difficulty in the convergence analysis of vartheta(r) is the bad behaviour of the cones mathcalKn(r) under adding a zero row/column: when applied to a matrix not in mathcalKn(0) this gives a matrix not in any mathcalKn+1(r), thereby showing strict inclusion for nge6. We investigate the graphs with vartheta(r)(G)=alpha(G) for r=0,1: we algorithmically reduce testing exactness of vartheta(0) to acritical graphs, we characterize critical graphs with vartheta(0) exact, and we exhibit graphs for which exactness of vartheta(1) is not preserved under adding an isolated node. This disproves a conjecture by Gvozdenovi'c and Laurent (2007) which, if true, would have implied the above conjecture by de Klerk and Pasechnik.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12876




Recommendations





Cited In (2)





This page was built for publication: Exactness of Parrilo’s Conic Approximations for Copositive Matrices and Associated Low Order Bounds for the Stability Number of a Graph

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6199282)