FEW SELF-INVOLVED AGENTS AMONG BOUNDED CONFIDENCE AGENTS CAN CHANGE NORMS

DOI10.1142/S0219525918500078arXiv1805.10176OpenAlexW2809191926MaRDI QIDQ6203280FDOQ6203280

Authors: Sylvie Huet, Jean-Denis Mathias 

Publication date: 27 March 2024

Published in: Advances in Complex Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Social issues are generally discussed by highly-involved and less-involved people to build social norms defining what has to be thought and done about them. As self-involved agents share different attitude dynamics to other agents Wood, Pool et al, 1996, we study the emergence and evolution of norms through an individual-based model involving these two types of agents. The dynamics of self-involved agents is drawn from Huet and Deffuant, 2010, and the dynamics of others, from Deffuant et al, 2001. The attitude of an agent is represented as a segment on a continuous attitudinal space. Two agents are close if their attitude segments share sufficient overlap. Our agents discuss two different issues, one of which, called main issue, is more important for the self-involved agents than the other, called secondary issue. Self-involved agents are attracted on both issues if they are close on main issue, but shift away from their peer's opinion if they are only close on secondary issue. Differently, non-self-involved agents are attracted by other agents when they are close on both the main and secondary issues. We observe the emergence of various types of extreme minor clusters. In one or different groups of attitudes, they can lead to an already-built moderate norm or a norm polarized on secondary and/or main issues. They can also push disagreeing agents gathered in different groups to a global moderate consensus.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.10176

zbMATH Keywords

normpolarizationrejectionattractionbounded confidence modelinvolvementextreme minority effect

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Game theory, economics, finance, and other social and behavioral sciences (91-XX)

Cites Work

• CONTINUOUS OPINION DYNAMICS UNDER BOUNDED CONFIDENCE: A SURVEY
• Opinion dynamics under the influence of radical groups, charismatic leaders, and other constant signals: a simple unifying model
• Openness leads to opinion stability and narrowness to volatility

This page was built for publication: FEW SELF-INVOLVED AGENTS AMONG BOUNDED CONFIDENCE AGENTS CAN CHANGE NORMS

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6203280)