Comparative applicability of MCDM‐SWOT based techniques for developing integrated watershed management framework

DOI10.1111/NRM.12380OpenAlexW4380685269MaRDI QIDQ6204699FDOQ6204699

Authors:

Publication date: 2 April 2024

Published in: Natural Resource Modeling (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12380

Recommendations

• Publication:4862930
• A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management
• Risk-based multiattribute decision-making in property and watershed management
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 770209
• Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development

zbMATH Keywords

optimal decision makingintegrated watershed managementstrategic planning modelsSWOT evaluation matrixwatershed stakeholder participation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Applications of game theory (91A80) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76)

Cites Work

• Multiple criteria decision aid. Methods, examples and Python implementations
• Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods
• Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.
• Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method

This page was built for publication: Comparative applicability of MCDM‐SWOT based techniques for developing integrated watershed management framework

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6204699)