Comparative applicability of MCDM‐SWOT based techniques for developing integrated watershed management framework

DOI10.1111/NRM.12380MaRDI QIDQ6204699zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors

Publication date 2 April 2024

Published in Natural Resource Modeling (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12380

zbMATH Keywords

integrated watershed managementoptimal decision makingstrategic planning modelsSWOT evaluation matrixwatershed stakeholder participation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of game theory (91A80) Decision theory (91B06) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 840763
• A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management
• Risk-based multiattribute decision-making in property and watershed management
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 770209
• Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development

Cites work

• Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method
• Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS.
• Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods
• Multiple criteria decision aid. Methods, examples and Python implementations

Cited in

(1)

• Development of TIVI: a novel hybrid method integrating topsis and VIKOR for multi-criteria decision making

This page was built for publication: Comparative applicability of MCDM‐SWOT based techniques for developing integrated watershed management framework

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6204699)