Multiplicity-free Representations of Algebraic Groups

DOI10.1090/MEMO/1466MaRDI QIDQ6204947OpenAlexFDO

Authors Martin W. Liebeck, Gary M. Seitz, Donna M. Testerman

Publication date 10 April 2024

Published in Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04476

zbMATH Keywords

algebraic groupmultiplicity-free representationrepresentation theoryirreducible subgroup

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Linear algebraic groups over the reals, the complexes, the quaternions (20G20) Representation theory for linear algebraic groups (20G05) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to group theory (20-02)

Abstract: Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and let $G$ be a connected reductive algebraic group over $K$. We address the problem of classifying triples $(G,H,V)$, where $H$ is a proper connected subgroup of $G$, and $V$ is a finite-dimensional irreducible $G$-module such that the restriction of $V$ to $H$ is multiplicity-free -- that is, each of its composition factors appears with multiplicity 1. A great deal of classical work, going back to Weyl, Dynkin, Howe, Stembridge and others, and also more recent work of the authors, can be set in this context. In this paper we determine all such triples in the case where $H$ and $G$ are both simple algebraic groups of type $A$, and $H$ is embedded irreducibly in $G$. While there are a number of interesting familes of such triples $(G,H,V)$, the possibilities for the highest weights of the representations defining the embeddings $H<G$ and $G<GL(V)$ are very restricted. For example, apart from two exceptional cases, both weights can only have support on at most two fundamental weights; and in many of the examples, one or other of the weights corresponds to the alternating or symmetric square of the natural module for either $G$ or $H$.

Recommendations

• Multiplicity-free representations of algebraic groups. II
• Restrictions of irreducible representations of algebraic groups of type \(A_n\) in characteristic 0 to subgroups of type \(A_1\times A_1\)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1211709
• Distinguished unipotent elements and multiplicity-free subgroups of simple algebraic groups
• Multiplicity-free subgroups of reductive algebraic groups

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4071206 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 51906 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1211709 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2005665 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2115428 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 796484 (Why is no real title available?)
• A classification of multiplicity free actions
• An algorithm for computing weight multiplicities in irreducible modules for complex semisimple Lie algebras
• Distinguished unipotent elements and multiplicity-free subgroups of simple algebraic groups
• Maximal subgroups of exceptional algebraic groups
• Multiplicity free subgroups of compact connected Lie groups
• On invariant theory under restricted groups
• Operators that Lower or Raise the Irreducible Vector Spaces of U n−1 Contained in an Irreducible Vector Space of Un
• Reductive subgroups of exceptional algebraic groups
• Représentations exceptionnelles des groupes semi-simples
• Small Degree Representations of Finite Chevalley Groups in Defining Characteristic
• Some remarks on nilpotent orbits
• Splitting the square of a Schur function into its symmetric and antisymmetric parts
• Stable branching rules for classical symmetric pairs
• Symmetry, Representations, and Invariants
• The Capelli identity, the double commutant theorem, and multiplicity-free actions
• The Magma algebra system. I: The user language
• The maximal subgroups of classical algebraic groups
• The maximal subgroups of the classical groups
• Unipotent and nilpotent classes in simple algebraic groups and Lie algebras.
• Why should the Littlewood-Richardson rule be true?

This page was built for publication: Multiplicity-free Representations of Algebraic Groups

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6204947)