Compactly representing utility functions using weighted goals and the Max aggregator

DOI10.1016/J.ARTINT.2010.07.003zbMATH Open1210.91035OpenAlexW2023581071MaRDI QIDQ622111FDOQ622111

Authors: Joel Uckelman, Ulle Endriss 

Publication date: 31 January 2011

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/939015/87830_UckelmanEndrissAIJ2010.pdf

Recommendations

• Representing Utility Functions via Weighted Goals
• Working with Preferences: Less Is More
• Computing Utility from Weighted Description Logic Preference Formulas
• Propositional distances and compact preference representation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1849163

zbMATH Keywords

preference aggregationpreference representation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Analysis of algorithms and problem complexity (68Q25) Utility theory (91B16) Other applications of logic (03B80)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence
• Combinatorial auctions. Foreword by Vernon L. Smith.
• The complexity of promise problems with applications to public-key cryptography
• Sequential composition of voting rules in multi-issue domains
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Logical preference representation and combinatorial vote
• Efficiency and envy-freeness in fair division of indivisible goods: logical representation and complexity
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The computational complexity of dominance and consistency in CP-nets
• Representing Utility Functions via Weighted Goals
• A Tractable and Expressive Class of Marginal Contribution Nets and Its Applications
• Computing Utility from Weighted Description Logic Preference Formulas
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (7)

• Approximating the Nash Social Welfare with Indivisible Items
• Representing and reasoning with qualitative preferences for compositional systems
• Coalition formation in social environments with logic-based agents1
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Representing Utility Functions via Weighted Goals
• Propositional distances and compact preference representation
• Applications of logic in social choice theory (invited talk)

Uses Software

• CP-nets

This page was built for publication: Compactly representing utility functions using weighted goals and the Max aggregator

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q622111)