About maximal number of edges in hypergraph-clique with chromatic number 3

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6226496

arXiv1107.1869MaRDI QIDQ6226496FDOQ6226496


Authors: Danila Cherkashin Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 10 July 2011

Abstract: Let H=(V,E) be a hypergraph. By the chromatic number of a hypergraph H=(V,E) we mean the minimum number chi(H) of colors needed to paint all the vertices in V so that any edge einE contains at least two vertices of some different colors. Finally, a hypergraph is said to form a clique, if its edges are pairwise intersecting. In 1973 ErdH{o}s and Lov'asz noticed that if an n-uniform hypergraph H=(V,E) forms a clique, then chi(H)in2,3. They untoduced following quantity. M(n) = max {|E|: exists { m an} n-{ m uniform} { m clique} H = (V,E) { m with} chi(H) = 3}. Obviously such definition has no sense in the case of chi(H)=2. Theorem 1 (P. Erdos, L. Lovasz} The inequalities hold n!(e-1) le M(n) le n^n. Almost nothing better has been done during the last 35 years. At the same time, another quantity r(n) was introduced by Lovasz r(n) = max {|E|: ~ exists { m an} ~ n-{ m uniform} ~ { m clique} ~ H = (V,E) ~ { m s.t.} ~ au(H) = n}, where au(H) is the {it covering number} of H, i.e., au(H) = min {|f|: ~ f subset V, ~ forall ~ e in E ~ f cap e eq emptyset}. Clearly, for any n-uniform clique H, we have au(H)len, and if chi(H)=3, then au(H)=n. Thus, M(n)ler(n). Lov'asz noticed that for r(n) the same estimates as in Theorem 1 apply and conjectured that the lower estimate is best possible. In 1996 P. Frankl, K. Ota, and N. Tokushige disproved this conjecture and showed that r(n)ge(fracn2)n1. We discovered a new upper bound for the r(n) (so for M(n) too). Theorem 2. M(n) leq r(n) le c n^{n-1/2} ln n. , where c is a constant.













This page was built for publication: About maximal number of edges in hypergraph-clique with chromatic number 3

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6226496)