Cohomological equation and cocycle rigidity of parabolic actions in SL(n,\RR)

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6236899

arXiv1211.0777MaRDI QIDQ6236899FDOQ6236899


Authors: Z. J. Wang Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 5 November 2012

Abstract: For any unitary representation (pi,mathcalH) of G=SL(n,RR), ngeq3 without non-trivial G-invariant vectors, we study smooth solutions of the cohomological equation mathfrakuf=g where mathfraku is a vector in the root space of mathfraksl(n,RR) and g is a given vector in mathcalH. We characterize the obstructions to solving the cohomological equation, construct smooth solutions of the cohomological equation and obtain tame Sobolev estimates for f. We also study common solutions to (the infinitesimal version of) the cocycle equation mathfrakuh=mathfrakvg, where mathfraku and mathfrakv are commutative vectors in different root spaces of mathfraksl(n,RR) and g and h are given vectors in mathcalH. We give precisely the condition under which the cocycle equation has common solutions: (*) if mathfraku and mathfrakv embed in mathfraksl(2,RR)imesRR, then the common solution exists. Otherwise, we show counter examples in each SL(n,RR), ngeq3. As an application, we obtain smooth cocycle rigidity for higher rank parabolic actions over SL(n,RR)/Gamma, ngeq4 if the Lie algebra of the acting parabolic subgroup contains a pair mathfraku and mathfrakv satisfying property (*) and prove that the cocycle rigidity fails otherwise. Especially, the cocycle rigidity always fails for SL(3,RR). The main new ingredient in the proof is making use of unitary duals of various subgroup in SL(n,RR) isomorphic to SL(2,RR)ltimesRR2 or (SL(2,RR)ltimesRR2)ltimesRR3 obtained by Mackey theory.













This page was built for publication: Cohomological equation and cocycle rigidity of parabolic actions in $SL(n,\RR)$

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6236899)