On ``Comment on supersymmetry, PT-symmetry and spectral bifurcation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:627669

DOI10.1016/J.AOP.2010.10.012zbMATH Open1208.81105arXiv1010.1909OpenAlexW2002764356MaRDI QIDQ627669FDOQ627669


Authors: Kumar Abhinav, Prasanta K. Panigrahi Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 3 March 2011

Published in: Annals of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In "Comment on Supersymmetry, PT-symmetry and spectral bifurcation" cite{BQ1}, Bagchi and Quesne correctly show the presence of a class of states for the complex Scarf-II potential in the unbroken PT-symmetry regime, which were absent in cite{AP}. However, in the spontaneously broken PT-symmetry case, their argument is incorrect since it fails to implement the condition for the potential to be PT-symmetric: CPT[2(AB)+alpha]=0. It needs to be emphasized that in the models considered in cite{AP}, PT is spontaneously broken, implying that the potential is PT- symmetric, whereas the ground state is not. Furthermore, our supersymmetry (SUSY)-based 'spectral bifurcation' holds extit{independent} of the sl(2) symmetry consideration for a large class of PT-symmetric potentials.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1909




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: On ``Comment on supersymmetry, PT-symmetry and spectral bifurcation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q627669)