Are the hyperharmonics integral? A partial answer via the small intervals containing primes
Let \(H_n:=1+\frac 12+\ldots+\frac 1n \) be the harmonic numbers. For a positive integer \(r\) the hyperharmonic numbers of order \(r\) are defined by \[ H_n^{(1)}:=H_n,H_n^{(r)}= \sum_{k=1}^nH_k^{(r-1)}, r>1. \] The authors prove: For any \(s\in(1,2)\) there is a prime number \(P_0\) such that for any integers \(r\) and \(n\) with \(5\leq r\leq (2-s)P_0+2\) and \(n\geq P_0\) the number \(H_n^{(r)}\) is not an integer. The number \(H_n^{(r)}\) is not an integer for \(n\geq 2\) and \(5\leq r\leq 25\), for \(n\geq 2.010.881\) and \(5\leq r\leq 2.010.761\), for \(n\geq 10.726.905.041\) and \(5\leq r\leq 10.726.904.664\).
- About the non-integer property of hyperharmonic numbers
- Almost all short intervals containing prime numbers
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 894522 (Why is no real title available?)
- Non-integerness of class of hyperharmonic numbers
- On the interval containing at least one prime number
- Sharper Bounds for the Chebyshev Functions θ(x) and ψ(x). II
- Short effective intervals containing primes
- The generalization and proof of Bertrand's postulate
- Divisibility properties of hyperharmonic numbers
- Harmonic number identities via polynomials with \(r\)-Lah coefficients
- Hyperharmonic integers exist
- Non-integerness of class of hyperharmonic numbers
- Almost all hyperharmonic numbers are not integers
- About the non-integer property of hyperharmonic numbers
- Evaluation of Euler-like sums via Hurwitz zeta values
- The difference of hyperharmonic numbers via geometric and analytic methods
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7069726 (Why is no real title available?)
- Density results on hyperharmonic integers
This page was built for publication: Are the hyperharmonics integral? A partial answer via the small intervals containing primes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q627730)
