Are the hyperharmonics integral? A partial answer via the small intervals containing primes
From MaRDI portal
Publication:627730
DOI10.1016/J.CRMA.2010.12.015zbMATH Open1226.11031OpenAlexW1976194947MaRDI QIDQ627730FDOQ627730
Authors: Rachid Aït Amrane, Hacène Belbachir
Publication date: 3 March 2011
Published in: Comptes Rendus. Mathématique. Académie des Sciences, Paris (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2010.12.015
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Short effective intervals containing primes
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Sharper Bounds for the Chebyshev Functions θ(x) and ψ(x). II
- Non-integerness of class of hyperharmonic numbers
- About the non-integer property of hyperharmonic numbers
- Almost all short intervals containing prime numbers
- On the interval containing at least one prime number
- The generalization and proof of Bertrand's postulate
Cited In (9)
- Hyperharmonic integers exist
- The difference of hyperharmonic numbers via geometric and analytic methods
- Evaluation of Euler-like sums via Hurwitz zeta values
- Almost all hyperharmonic numbers are not integers
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Harmonic number identities via polynomials with \(r\)-Lah coefficients
- Divisibility properties of hyperharmonic numbers
- About the non-integer property of hyperharmonic numbers
- Non-integerness of class of hyperharmonic numbers
This page was built for publication: Are the hyperharmonics integral? A partial answer via the small intervals containing primes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q627730)