Understanding Sparse JL for Feature Hashing
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6315296
arXiv1903.03605MaRDI QIDQ6315296FDOQ6315296
Authors: Meena Jagadeesan
Publication date: 8 March 2019
Abstract: Feature hashing and other random projection schemes are commonly used to reduce the dimensionality of feature vectors. The goal is to efficiently project a high-dimensional feature vector living in into a much lower-dimensional space , while approximately preserving Euclidean norm. These schemes can be constructed using sparse random projections, for example using a sparse Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) transform. A line of work introduced by Weinberger et. al (ICML '09) analyzes the accuracy of sparse JL with sparsity 1 on feature vectors with small -to- norm ratio. Recently, Freksen, Kamma, and Larsen (NeurIPS '18) closed this line of work by proving a tight tradeoff between -to- norm ratio and accuracy for sparse JL with sparsity . In this paper, we demonstrate the benefits of using sparsity greater than in sparse JL on feature vectors. Our main result is a tight tradeoff between -to- norm ratio and accuracy for a general sparsity , that significantly generalizes the result of Freksen et. al. Our result theoretically demonstrates that sparse JL with can have significantly better norm-preservation properties on feature vectors than sparse JL with ; we also empirically demonstrate this finding.
Has companion code repository: https://github.com/mjagadeesan/sparsejl-featurehashing
This page was built for publication: Understanding Sparse JL for Feature Hashing
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6315296)