Further Results on the Pseudo-L_{g}(s) Association Scheme with g\geq 3, s\geq g+2

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6324977

arXiv1909.04199MaRDI QIDQ6324977FDOQ6324977


Authors: Congwei Wang, Shanqi Pang, Guangzhou Chen Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 9 September 2019

Abstract: It is inevitable that the Lg(s) association scheme with ggeq3,sgeqg+2 is a pseudo-Lg(s) association scheme. On the contrary, although s2 treatments of the pseudo-Lg(s) association scheme can form one Lg(s) association scheme, it is not always an Lg(s) association scheme. Mainly because the set of cardinality s, which contains two first-associates treatments of the pseudo-Lg(s) association scheme, is non-unique. Whether the order s of a Latin square mathbfL is a prime power or not, the paper proposes two new conditions in order to extend a POL(s,w) containing mathbfL. It has been known that a POL(s,w) can be extended to a POL(s,s1) so long as Bruck's cite{brh} condition sgeqfrac(s1w)42(s1w)3+2(s1w)2+(s1w)2 is satisfied, Bruck's condition will be completely improved through utilizing six properties of the Lw+2(s) association scheme in this paper. Several examples are given to elucidate the application of our results.













This page was built for publication: Further Results on the Pseudo-$L_{g}(s)$ Association Scheme with $g\geq 3$, $s\geq g+2$

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6324977)