The proper definition and Wielandt-Hartley's theorem for submaximal \mathfrak{X}-subgroups

DOI10.1007/S00605-020-01425-4MaRDI QIDQ6327652arXivFDO

Authors D. O. Revin, Saveliĭ Vyacheslavovich Skresanov, Andrey Vasil'ev

Publication date 22 October 2019

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sylow subgroups, Sylow properties, (pi)-groups, (pi)-structure (20D20) Subnormal subgroups of abstract finite groups (20D35) Maximal subgroups (20E28)

Abstract: A nonempty class $mathfrakX$ of finite groups is called complete if it is closed under taking subgroups, homomorphic images and extensions. We deal with a classical problem of determining $mathfrakX$-maximal subgroups. We consider two definitions of submaximal $mathfrakX$-subgroups suggested by Wielandt and discuss which one better suits our task. We prove that these definitions are not equivalent yet Wielandt-Hartley's theorem holds true for either definition of $mathfrakX$-submaximality. We also give some applications of the strong version of Wielandt-Hartley's theorem.

This page was built for publication: The proper definition and Wielandt-Hartley's theorem for submaximal $\mathfrak{X}$-subgroups

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6327652)