A categorical framework for glider representations

arXiv2003.05930MaRDI QIDQ6336643FDOQ6336643

Authors: Ruben Henrard, Adam-Christiaan van Roosmalen 

Publication date: 12 March 2020

Abstract: Fragment and glider representations (introduced by F. Caenepeel, S. Nawal, and F. Van Oystaeyen) form a generalization of filtered modules over a filtered ring. Given a $Gamma$-filtered ring $FR$ and a subset $LambdasubseteqGamma$, we provide a category $operatorname{Glid}_{L}ambdaFR$ of glider representations, and show that it is a complete and cocomplete deflation quasi-abelian category. We discuss its derived category, and its subcategories of natural gliders and Noetherian gliders. If $R$ is a bialgebra over a field $k$ and $FR$ is a filtration by bialgebras, we show that $operatorname{Glid}_{L}ambdaFR$ is a monoidal category which is derived equivalent to the category of representations of a semi-Hopf category (in the sense of E. Batista, S. Caenepeel, and J. Vercruysse). We show that the monoidal category of glider representations associated to the one-step filtration $kcdot1subseteqR$ of a bialgebra $R$ is sufficient to recover the bialgebra $R$ by recovering the usual fiber functor from $operatorname{Glid}_{L}ambdaFR.$ When applied to a group algebra $kG$, this shows that the monoidal category $operatorname{Glid}_{L}ambdaF(kG)$ alone is sufficient to distinguish even isocategorical groups.

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Abelian categories, Grothendieck categories (18E10) Localization of categories, calculus of fractions (18E35) Filtered associative rings; filtrational and graded techniques (16W70)

This page was built for publication: A categorical framework for glider representations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6336643)