Complete convergence of the Hilbert transform
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6348951
arXiv2009.05822MaRDI QIDQ6348951FDOQ6348951
Authors: Sakin Demir
Publication date: 12 September 2020
Abstract: Suppose that , and suppose that for any sequence of integers there exits a constant such that sharpleft{kinmathbb{Z}:sup_{ngeq 1}left|sum_{iin mathcal{B}_n-t_n} !!!
aise{1.9ex}hbox{}; frac{a_{k+i}}{i}
ight|>lambda
ight}\ leq C_1sharpleft{kinmathbb{Z}:sup_{ngeq 1}left|sum_{iin mathcal{B}_n} !!
aise{1.9ex}hbox{}; frac{a_{k+i}}{i}
ight|>lambda
ight}, for all , where . Then there is a constant which does not depend on the sequence such that sum_{n=1}^inftysharpleft{kinmathbb{Z}:left|sum_{i=-n}^{n} !!
aise{1.9ex}hbox{}; frac{a_{k+i}}{i}
ight|>lambda
ight}leqfrac{C_2}{lambda}sum_{i=-infty}^{infty}|a_i| for all . Let be a measure space, an invertible measure-preserving transformation, and suppose that such that for any sequence of integers there exists a constant such that muleft{ x: sup_{ngeq 1}left|sum_{iin mathcal{B}_n-t_n}!!!
aise{1.9ex}hbox{}; frac{f( au^ix)}{i}
ight| >lambda
ight}leq C_1muleft{x: sup_{ngeq 1}left|sum_{iin mathcal{B}_n}!!
aise{1.9ex}hbox{}; frac{f( au^i x)}{i}
ight|>lambda
ight} for all , where . Then there exists a constant which does not depend on such that sum_{n=1}^inftymuleft{x:left|sum_{i=-n}^{n}!!
aise{1.9ex}hbox{} ;frac{f( au^ix)}{i}
ight|>lambda
ight}leqfrac{C_2}{lambda}|f|_1 for all .
This page was built for publication: Complete convergence of the Hilbert transform
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6348951)