Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of disease

DOI10.1007/S00180-009-0155-YMaRDI QIDQ638052zbMATHOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors J. A. Roldán Nofuentes, P. Femia Marzo, Juan de Dios Luna del Castillo

Publication date 8 September 2011

Published in Computational Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-009-0155-y

zbMATH Keywords

sensitivityspecificitymaximum likelihood estimatesSEM-algorithm

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics (62-08) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Medical applications (general) (92C50) Testing in survival analysis and censored data (62N03)

Recommendations

• Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification
• Comparison of the accuracy of multiple binary tests in the presence of partial disease verification
• Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
• EM algorithm for comparing two binary diagnostic tests when not all the patients are verified
• Determining sample size to evaluate and compare the accuracy of binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial disease verification
• The likelihood approach for the comparison of medical diagnostic system with multiple binary tests
• Evaluation and computation of diagnostic tests: a simple alternative
• Recommended methods to compare the accuracy of two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design
• Comparisons of Predictive Values of Binary Medical Diagnostic Tests for Paired Designs

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1818516 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3567782 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1865745 (Why is no real title available?)
• A new confidence interval for the difference between two binomial proportions of paired data
• Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests
• Comparing Accuracies of Two Screening Tests in a Two-Phase Study for Dementia
• Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
• EM algorithm for comparing two binary diagnostic tests when not all the patients are verified
• Estimating the Error Rates of Diagnostic Tests
• Inference and missing data
• Maximum likelihood estimators of sensitivity and specificity corrected for verification bias
• Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
• The Effect of Verification Bias in the Naïve Estimators of Accuracy of a Binary Diagnostic Test
• The effect of verification bias on the comparison of predictive values of two binary diagnostic tests

Cited in

(7)

• Comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias
• Determining sample size to evaluate and compare the accuracy of binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial disease verification
• Comparison of the accuracy of multiple binary tests in the presence of partial disease verification
• A pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary medical tests
• EM algorithm for comparing two binary diagnostic tests when not all the patients are verified
• Asymptotic hypothesis test to simultaneously compare the weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests in the presence of ignorable missing data
• EM and SEM algorithms to compare the weighted kappa coefficients of two diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification and discrete covariates

This page was built for publication: Computational methods for comparing two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification of disease

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q638052)