On the time reversal invariance of classical electromagnetic theory

From MaRDI portal
Publication:640069

DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2003.09.006zbMATH Open1222.78008arXivgr-qc/0312085OpenAlexW2114045994MaRDI QIDQ640069FDOQ640069


Authors: David B. Malament Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 October 2011

Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: David Albert claims that classical electromagnetic theory is not time reversal invariant. He acknowledges that all physics books say that it is, but claims they are "simply wrong" because they rely on an incorrect account of how the time reversal operator acts on magnetic fields. On that account, electric fields are left intact by the operator, but magnetic fields are inverted. Albert sees no reason for the asymmetric treatment, and insists that neither field should be inverted. I argue, to the contrary, that the inversion of magnetic fields makes good sense and is, in fact, forced by elementary geometric considerations. I also suggest a way of thinking about the time reversal invariance of classical electromagnetic theory -- one that makes use of the invariant four-dimensional formulation of the theory -- that makes no reference to magnetic fields at all. It is my hope that it will be of interest in its own right, Albert aside. It has the advantage that it allows for arbitrary curvature in the background spacetime structure, and is therefore suitable for the framework of general relativity. The only assumption one needs is temporal orientability.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0312085




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (20)





This page was built for publication: On the time reversal invariance of classical electromagnetic theory

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q640069)