A new spin on the hole argument

DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2004.10.003MaRDI QIDQ640216zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors D. P. Rickles

Publication date 17 October 2011

Published in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.10.003

zbMATH Keywords

hole argumentloop quantum gravityspin-networkssubstantivalism vs. relationalism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Gravitational interaction in quantum theory (81V17) Quantization of the gravitational field (83C45)

Recommendations

• A hole revolution, or are we back where we started?
• Bringing the hole argument back in the loop: a response to Pooley
• Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’
• New perspectives on the hole argument
• Representation and Spacetime: The Hole Argument Revisited

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5148382 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5148384 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 732164 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2079216 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1530437 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 954070 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 742843 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2114370 (Why is no real title available?)
• DEGENERATE SCALAR INVARIANTS AND THE GROUPS OF MOTION OF A RIEMANN SPACE
• Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
• Separable Hilbert space in loop quantum gravity
• The Hole Truth

Cited in

(7)

• The deep metaphysics of quantum gravity: the seventeenth century legacy and an alternative ontology beyond substantivalism and relationism
• The hole argument and some physical and philosophical implications
• Loop quantum gravity: a new threat to humeanism? I: The problem of spacetime
• Regarding the `hole argument' and the `problem of time'
• A hole revolution, or are we back where we started?
• Bringing the hole argument back in the loop: a response to Pooley
• Regarding the ‘Hole Argument’

This page was built for publication: A new spin on the hole argument

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q640216)