Surfaces away from horizons are not thermodynamic

DOI10.1038/S41467-018-05433-9arXiv2207.04390WikidataQ61135209 ScholiaQ61135209MaRDI QIDQ6404501FDOQ6404501

Publication date: 10 July 2022

Abstract: Since the 1970's it has been known that black hole (and other) horizons are truly thermodynamic in nature. More generally, surfaces which are not horizons have also been conjectured to behave thermodynamically. Initially, for surfaces microscopically expanded from a horizon to so-called stretched horizons, and more recently, for more general ordinary surfaces in the emergent gravity program. To test these conjectures we ask whether such surfaces satisfy an analogue to the first law of thermodynamics (as do horizons). For static asymptotically-flat spacetimes we find that such a first law holds on horizons. We rigorously prove that this law remains an excellent approximation for stretched horizons, but perhaps counter-intuitively this result illustrates the insufficiency of the laws of black hole mechanics alone from implying truly thermodynamic behavior. For surfaces away from horizons in the emergent gravity program the first law fails (with the exception of fully spherically symmetric scenarios) thus undermining the key thermodynamic assumption of this program.

This page was built for publication: Surfaces away from horizons are not thermodynamic

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6404501)