Vertex Partitions and Maximum \G-free Subgraphs

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6404627




Abstract: For a given graph H and the graphical properties P1,P2,ldots,Pk, we say the graph H has a (V1,V2,ldots,Vk)-decomposition, if for each iin[k], the subgraph induced on Vi has a property Pi. Bollob'{a}s and Manvel, have shown that for a graph H with maximum degree Delta(H)geq3 and clique number omega(H)leqDelta(H), if Delta(H)=p+q, then there exists a (V1,V2)-decomposition of V(H), such that Delta(H[V1])leqp, Delta(H[V2])leqq, H[V1] is (p1)-degenerate, and H[V2] is (q1)-degenerate. Matamala, has shown that if Delta(H)=p+q, then there exists a (V1,V2)-decomposition of V(H), so that H[V1] is a maximum (p1)-degenerate induced subgraph and H[V2] is (q1)-degenerate. Catlin and Lai, have proven that H has a (V1,V2)-decomposition so thst H[V1] is a maximum acyclic set and omega(H[V2]),Delta(H[V2])leqDelta2(Delta(H)geq5). For a graph G, when Pi is the property of not containing a subgraph isomorphic to G. Now suppose that H is a connected graph with maximum degree Delta(H)geq5,(wherek=2), and Delta(H)geq9,(wherekgeq3), omega(H)leqDelta(H)1, and H is a KDelta(H)setminuse-free graph. Assume that p1geqp2geqcdotsgeqpkgeq3 are k positive integers, such that sumi=1kpi=Delta(H)1+k. For each iin[k1], set Gi as a collection of graphs with minimum degree at least pi1. Then there exists a (V1,V2,ldots,Vk)-decomposition of V(H), such that H[V1] is G1-free, V1 has the maximum possible size, H[Vi] is Gi-free for each 2leqileqk1 and Delta(H[Vk])leqpk, and either H[Vk] is Kpk-free or its pk-cliques are disjoint.











This page was built for publication: Vertex Partitions and Maximum $\G$-free Subgraphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6404627)