Relative (functionally) Type I spaces and narrow subspaces
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6408437
arXiv2208.10096MaRDI QIDQ6408437FDOQ6408437
Authors: Mathieu Baillif
Publication date: 22 August 2022
Abstract: An open chain cover ( a cardinal) of a space is a systematic cover if the closure of is contained in when , and is Type I if and the closure of each is Lindel"of. A closed subspace is narrow in if for each systematic cover of , either there is such that is included in , or the closure of intersected with is Lindel"of for each . Taking systematic covers given by preimages by of for a continuous (where is the longray) defines functionally Type I spaces and functionally narrow subspaces. For instance, and are narrow in themselves and any other space. We investigate these properties and relative versions, as well as their relationship, and show in particular the following. There are functionally Hausdorff Type I spaces which are not functionally Type I while regular Type I spaces are functionally Type I. We exhibit examples of spaces which are narrow in some but not in other spaces. There are subspaces of a Tychonoff space that are functionally narrow but not narrow in , while both notions agree if is normal. Under PFA and using classical results, any -compact locally compact countably tight Type I space contains a non-Lindel"of subspace narrow in it (a copy of , actually), while a Suslin tree does not. There are spaces with subspaces narrow in them that are essentially discrete. Finally, we investigate natural partial orders on (functionally) narrow subspaces and when these orders are - or -closed.
Recommendations
Consistency and independence results in general topology (54A35) Noncompact covering properties (paracompact, Lindelöf, etc.) (54D20) Fairly general properties of topological spaces (54D99)
This page was built for publication: Relative (functionally) Type I spaces and narrow subspaces
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6408437)