\mathbb Z₃⁸ is not a CI-group

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6429705

arXiv2303.08742MaRDI QIDQ6429705FDOQ6429705


Authors: Joy Morris Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 15 March 2023

Abstract: A Cayley graph Cay(G;S) has the CI (Cayley Isomorphism) property if for every isomorphic graph Cay(G;T), there is a group automorphism alpha of G such that Salpha=T. The DCI (Directed Cayley Isomorphism) property is defined analogously on digraphs. A group G is a CI-group if every Cayley graph on G has the CI property, and is a DCI-group if every Cayley digraph on G has the DCI property. Since a graph is a special type of digraph, this means that every DCI-group is a CI-group, and if a group is not a CI-group then it is not a DCI-group, but there are well-known examples of groups that are CI-groups but not DCI-groups. In 2009, Spiga showed that mathbbZ38 is not a DCI-group, by producing a digraph that does not have the DCI property. He also showed that mathbbZ35 is a DCI-group (and therefore also a CI-group). Until recently the question of whether there are elementary abelian 3-groups that are not CI-groups remained open. In a recent preprint with Dave Witte Morris, we showed that mathbbZ310 is not a CI-group. In this paper we show that with slight modifications, the underlying undirected graph of order 38 described by Spiga is does not have the CI property, so mathbbZ38 is not a CI-group.













This page was built for publication: $\mathbb Z_3^8$ is not a CI-group

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6429705)